![]() The bigger problem is the non-deterministic behavior on non-realtime operating systems. In any case, for modern USB-2 systems, if the interface has been correctly implemented there should be practically no difference in the hardware overhead (which is a very small percentage of the overall overhead) between system vendors. I would not trust calculated latencies as what they report is only a small part of the signal processing chain. Equivalent to hearing a source 4.46m (14.6ft) away. I've been satisfied in terms of latency, but I'm annoyed by the fact that any guitar with active pickups yields a hot signal even with input set at a minimum (a complaint that apparently has been made by many other users). It does this by measuring the phase delay of the feedback of playback sent through an input.įor the UMC404HD I get 13ms round trip delay (this includes the signal processing chain). Discussion Best USB audio interface in 2018 I'm currently using a Steinberg UR22MKII. The linux audio driver has the capability to preform a hardware loop-back latency measurement. Many times the calculations are only half-duplex, meaning only the input latency is estimated, not the round trip latency, which of course is what matters. Latency calculations are bullshit, 'cause they don't include all the steps in the processing chain. ![]() Is that a latency measurement, or calculation?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |